Member training from December 29th 2025.

Rod presents tonight on the lies of the Civil Rights movement and how it effects us to this day and why it should be opposed and repealed.

Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

TRANSCRIPT
welcome everybody uh we were just going to have pam give us an opening prayer would
you do that now pam please yes father in heaven as we paused at the beginning of
our training tonight we’re grateful for rod and his willingness to lead us through
the discussion and his knowledge and we pray thy spirit to be upon him and from
his mouth to our hearts that we can understand principles that would guide us to do
the things that would have would have us soon. We pray for Bennett. He would be
well. His family would be well. We are so grateful for the opportunities we have
because of where we live and the people we know. We pray to be strong and valiant
in the things that we believe in and sharing them. And we say this in the name of
our Savior, Jesus the Christ. Amen. Okay. Well, I put this one together on kind of
short notice, but this is actually the training tonight is going to be, interestingly
enough. It’s going to be on a book that I read a while back, a couple years back,
by a man named Alan Stang. He passed away just a couple, within the past couple
years, I think. And he used to write for a website called News with Views, which
is kind of a conservative outlet. And in the 60s, in 65,
he put out a book called It’s Very Simple, the True Story of Civil Rights. So
that’s actually what we’re going to talk about tonight because I did a deep dive on
it. I had a website up for a while that where I posted deep dives into different
books that I read. And this was one of the first ones that I put up. So I went
through a bunch of my old writings on this. And we’re going to cover what is
covered in this book tonight. So a lot of it is going to be new to you.
I guarantee it was all new to me when I read it. And we’re going to use the
language that’s used in the book. So some of it may seem a little outdated,
just some of the phraseology, but I’m going to use his language as like I said, as
a
should and then I’ll get the the presentation started. Go ahead, Carmen.
She says she can only hear you through the phone. Are you? Hold on. I thought she
was ready, but she’s not. Stand by. Okay. All right. We’ll hold tight.
I’m looking at this book at a thrift bookstore. It’s very simple,
$101 or $150. For this book I’m talking about? If you check Abe books,
A -B -E. That’s exactly where I am. Oh, is it? Every once in a while you can find
it. What’s funny, if you’re seeing it at that price, then that’s funny because I
actually found a copy just a couple months ago at the thrift shop for like 50
cents. Wow. Well, there’s a reason I want you to buy it. It’s when they do that.
No, that’s true. I want you to have it. Yeah, 100%. And if you look it up on
archive .org, which generally lets you read like public domain and out of print
stuff, this is one that they will force you to like check out from the online
library. And they only let you basically check it out, like in one hour increments,
which is really irritating. Yeah. I noticed that they have implemented this retarded
system. And so I first discovered it. I was looking at, I was researching a book
called After the Ball, How America Will Overcome Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the
90s. It was written in the 1980s and late 80s. And that book is actually the
playbook for what we have seen happen with the Sodomite Supremacy Movement over the
years. So I highly recommend it. But that book was the one I checked out. And then
I went for dinner and came back to read the book some more. And it had checked it
back in to the library and had to check it out again after just an hour.
Pretty frustrating.
If you’re not hearing me or anything, you can message me through the platform.
I’m going to switch to a different screen here
and go ahead and get this started. All right. Can you see that?
Sure. Okay.
Perfect. I tested it with my phone earlier. I just wanted to make sure, though, for
you guys. So right on. Okay, here we are. Let’s go ahead and get a move on. So
here’s a better view of the book here.
Now, the stuff that the details in this presentation I’m going to give tonight come
either directly from the book or from sources referenced in the book.
of things that happen that we hear about and we don’t recognize the significance of
i think ben is actually pretty good at seeing the significance of things as they
come up immediately i think for me it takes me a little more time i have to kind
of mull it over before i realize oh wait a minute this is this is how this plays
into the conspiracy right um but anyways the point being we don’t always know what’s
going on they hide a lot of things from us and some things they do in plain
sight, and we don’t realize the actual importance, right? And so this book,
like I said, as you could see on the screen here, it was published in 1965. So it
was actually being written as these things were taking place. And so that’s something
that’s interesting is that the lesson tonight, the presentation tonight, is actually
only going to go over the first half of the book and then I’ll have to pick it
up maybe next week with the second half but it’s interesting that he posits things
that he sees are probably going to happen in the future and with like 60 years of
hindsight now we can see that he was right about it so that’s something that’s very
interesting about this book here and one of the things that he does really well in
this book similar to what Ben did in invasion is he goes
So the way he wrote this book, he went back and he starts telling us about,
like I said, different individuals, different people. And then in the second half of
the book, you see everything come together. So in this first part, some of the
stuff might seem a little disjointed, but I promise you that all of it is
irrelevant and all comes together in the end. so for since you’ve got the Harlem
riots in 1964 and went just a few days after that you had rioting that broke out
in a lot of other cities across America there was looting property damage some
people were killed 10 years before that 11 years before that you have MLK speaking
in Washington there was a march that was there to demand the passage of the civil
rights Bill.
And what’s interesting about him is that people often refer to him as,
oh, hold on one second.
I need to apologize.
I need to let Carmen back into the room here.
Okay.
What’s interesting is that there’s a lot of people that refer to MLK as the
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, but something that’s interesting there is that if
you do some research into him and his religious views, he actually wrote a paper
when he was at Crozier Theological Seminary entitled,
of this online on our YouTube channel, I’ll make sure and put links in the
description so that people can go and read those things for themselves if they want.
There’s some colleges that have put out papers on the plagiarism. Stanford did an
article about his theological dissertation in which he,
like I said, he denied the divinity of Christ, among other things. And then over
here on the right, you’ve got Malcolm X in 64. He went to Cairo, went to a
meeting of a council of ministers called the Organization for African Unity. And what
he was trying to get them to do was to go before the UN and get the UN as an
international body to take up, quote, unquote, civil rights as an issue,
as an international issue. And we’re going to get into that a little bit more in
the presentation tonight and then you’ve got in 64 you’ve got president linden baines
johnson signing the anti -poverty bill so you look at this these four pictures here
and you might think wow these are some some of them are somewhat related but what
you know all four of them together what is up to do with anything but
oh my goodness what’s going on here
is called The National Question.
There’s a quote from Stalin. He says, how will we bring the masses of a nation
into the communist program? We have fashioned a number of organizations without which
we could not wage war on capitalism. Trade unions, cooperatives, workshop committees,
labor parties, women’s associations, a labor press, educational leagues, youth
societies. As often as not, these are non -party organizations. Again,
this is Stalin. And you’ll notice, again, like you mentioned, these are non -communist
organizations a lot of the times. And there’s a reason for that, or a couple
reasons, actually. One is that some organizations can be led unknowingly to further
the agenda of the communists, right? And number two, the global conspiracy controls
the communists, but they’re not limited to using solely communist to accomplish their
agenda. Like Ben always points out, they are just a tentacle of the beast,
right? I’m sorry, I’ve got to go back out one more time. It looks like somebody
else got dropped. Sorry, we’re having technical issues tonight.
I haven’t had this problem before.
Let me go back
and we’ll get back into the presentation here
there we go all
right so in 1913 lenin assigned Stalin to come up with a position on minorities and
he determined that they are nations within nations and therefore have a right to
complete secession, which they referred to as self -determination, which the communists
could agitate for or against, according to their own interests. And this will make
more sense as we go on. They first use this tactic in Russia in 1917.
Lenin specified that social revolution cannot come about without civil war,
combined with a whole series of democratic and revolutionary movements. The author,
Alan Stang, points out that Marx and Lennon both wanted to produce one socialist
world via internationalism to merge the nations, which obviously we’ve seen come about
in the last 60 years. And of course, this first required the complete liberation of
all, quote unquote, oppressed nations. And this first required the promotion of
nationalist movements. Communists would support such movements, but at the same time,
they would seek to obtain control over them so they could more easily be used to
unify that nation with global socialism. So you’ll see this as a theme, right?
When it works in their favor, they support it, and when it doesn’t, they don’t.
Can I let a couple other people back in here. Oh, new people into the room. I
apologize. Thanks for joining us, everybody.
Quote from the book here says, Victory will come when the communists under cloak of
the national liberation movement take control of the government.
In our day, internationalism is known more commonly as globalism, but they are
identical, the merging of all the nations into a new world order. The necessary
agitation has been going on in the United States for a long time among Native
American tribes, even under the exact same terminology, self -determination of a nation
within a nation. If you have any idea that this is a communist tactic being used
to further their own destruction, there will be no tribes under global socialism and
no more determining their own path. So this is just me right here, adding a little
bit to what’s discussed in the book. I personally am Native American. I lived on
the Navajo Reservation for a couple years or just over a year and a half almost.
And I also lived right near one of the Apache Reservations.
And my dad led a branch of our church there and so I have had a lot of
connections with a lot of different tribes over the years and this is something that
I have seen that I know I recognize it myself the communist movement acting within
the Native American tribes the same way that they have done among the blacks as
well over the years and you’ll see as we continue this discussion of civil rights
tonight you will see how there’s a lot of similarities.
And in our own day, we’ve seen the controlled news media begin to openly discuss
secession of states as a reasonable consideration. After having openly opposed and
mocked the idea for decades, you’ve got like people up in, what is it, part of
Oregon, they want to call it the state of, what is it,
Jackson or something like that. I can’t remember what it is off top of my head
when we lived in northern california we’d hear about all the time they wanted they
want to break off and become a piece of idaho and um anyways um so this fits
there described tactic tactic of only supporting such movements when they serve the
agenda which is nothing short of divide conquer and in his opening notes alan stang
points out that this book’s not just about civil rights but about a familiar process
that was being used like i was mentioning a minute ago indeed it’s still being used
under the name of civil rights.
mild, restrained, and orderly entry to power.
In China, Mao Zetang came to power under the guise of fighting corruption and ending
colonialism. He publicly referred to himself as a Stalinist, and in English language
publication, stated that the Chinese Revolution is a portion of the international
revolution, meaning communism. The U .S. Army, however, told their troops that they
were simply agrarian reformers who wanted democracy. Aw. Well,
why wouldn’t we help them, right? Of course, the conspiracy -controlled New York Times
dutifully reported that the Chinese communists were not like the Soviet communists and
would certainly be different. They would be setting up a democratic government, they
said, and not one -party rule. However, as we all know, when Comrade Mao had been
in power only a few years, he’d already murdered 20 million of his fellow Chinese,
right? And according to Stang, U .S. foreign policy then changed, quote -unquote,
forcing the United States to now take the side of the Soviets against the Chinese.
In the case of Fidel Castro, who came to power in Cuba, the New York Times
published Castro’s denial of charges of communist influence in his regime. No, said
the Times. He was trying to develop industry and end unemployment. In that same
article, they also note that U .S. sugar companies would not be able to save their
properties from seizure under the new land reform law. And if you know anything
about that when Castro came to power, certainly he went in and just took over,
assumed the sugar companies, even though they were U .S. They were running in his
country. He took them. In another article in the same issue of the Times, they
claim that Castro’s movement, quote, fought for democracy, freedom, social justice,
and rather unhappily, for an extreme nationalism. Five or six weeks later,
the Times reported on the resignation of Cuba’s Air Force chief due to communist
influence in the armed forces and government. Two weeks later, they printed his
testimony, including things Castro had told him about getting rid of the banks,
taking land from everybody, and giving Cuba a system like Russia has. The next day,
they printed a strongly worded front page opinion piece about how there was not a
communist revolution in any sense of the word in Cuba after the article’s author had
asked Cubans of all walks of life and with many Americans what they thought. The
article goes on to say that Castro is not only not only not communist, but
decidedly anti -communist, even though he does not consider it desirable in the
present circumstances to attack or destroy the Reds, as he is in a position to do
anytime he wants. But of course, two and a half years later, Castro publicly
announced on TV that he was forming a United Party of Cuba’s Socialist Revolution, a
monolithic organization like the Soviet Communist Party with restricted membership and
acknowledged that he was a Marxist -Leninist, taking Cuba down the path to communism.
The Times reporter who tried so hard to cover for Castro was later promoted to
their editorial board. What a surprise.
In Algeria, an integral part of France, the Muslims, this is a part of history that
most of us don’t know anything about, the Muslims suddenly realized that they were a
nation within that nation and they wanted to secede. They held a referendum, exactly
what Lenin said should happen, to find out if the quote -unquote nation wanted to
succeed. And of course they did. When war broke out, Cuba supplied arms and training
to the Algerians. And when it was suggested that the Algerians were being influenced
by communists, they publicly denied it. The New York Times said that the State
Department had made a serious blunder in making the suggestion, while in the same
article admitting it is true that Premier Ben Bella, the man leading the Algerian
Revolution, has criticized capitalists and praised Fidel Castro, and received $100
million from Moscow and $50 million from Beijing,
attributing it to a native brand of socialism and not communism. A week later,
Ben Bella was awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union during which Soviet leader
Nikita Khrushchev praised the close ties between Algeria and both Cuba and the Soviet
Union. So again, deny, deny, deny. And then, whoops, once we’ve got everything in
place, we’ve done everything we want to do, then we can just be as open as we
want to be. Admit to it. In Africa, guerrillas were trained by the Cubans and
reinforced by Russia and or China. Yeah.
When Mozambique nationalists decided they wanted to free themselves from Portuguese
rule, it was admitted that the freedom fighters, quote -unquote, had been trained in
Algeria, but they refused to confirm or deny that the nationalists were using arms
of Soviet origin. They were only seeking, quote -unquote, self -determination. Okay,
that’s the phrase. Again, they decided they were going to use this phrase, this self
-determination. You’re a nation within a nation, and you should determine for yourself.
train militants. So again, we’re going country by country here in Africa. And this
is something that never gets mentioned, which is the degree of communist control of
Africa. That entire nation, or almost the entire nation, is controlled by Soviet and
Chinese communists.
The United States trained, armed, and gave a billion dollars of foreign aid to
Indonesia, A billion dollars in, you know, 40s, 50s, 60s money,
placing a man named Sikarno in charge of the country. Prior to this, however,
he’d been imprisoned in a Dutch concentration camp in the island of Flores for
organizing Marxist fighting squads. A year and a half later, it was reported that no
open criticism against the Communist Party has been tolerated there. Sikarno pardoned
two convicted communist criminals and appointed them to high office. He was awarded
the Order of Lenin and proclaimed himself a communist of the highest order. He
praised the Viet Cong even while America was fighting them in Vietnam. So again,
we gave them a billion dollars in aid in Indonesia. And then this is what happened.
We put this communist in charge, and then he praised the Viet Cong we were fighting
in Vietnam. In Puerto Rico, student demonstrations, quote -unquote, against police
brutality, saw riots, burning of cars, fights with police, and so forth. This was
led by a group of revolutionary students who had been trained in China and Cuba
earlier the same year.
And around the time the book was being written, like I said, 65, a group in Canada
was fighting for the, quote -unquote, national independence of quote.
from the present federal union with English -speaking Canada.
At least one person arrested in relation to this group was reportedly trained for
revolutionary work in Cuba. And then Alan Stang closes this chapter with the
following statement. One, we have proved by quoting their own words what the
communists mean to do. Two, we’ve proved by using quotations from the pages of the
New York Times that they are doing what they mean to do all over the world and
three we have proved through the use of reason applied to quotations from the times
that over and over again you have been fooled and then looking at this thing the
these things here it quickly becomes obvious that the same process using the same
patterns has been implemented across the world throughout the last century and just
imagine we never learned any of it this is all all new like I said when I read
this book a couple years ago.
only find out about it afterwards and you might recall um the uh wicked witch of
the west senator from california who told everybody look we you can’t know what’s in
the bill until we pass it if you remember that i believe that was when they were
passing the uh patriot act or the n d a one of the two
And I apologize for going kind of quick tonight. Like I said, this is a longer
presentation. I don’t want to drag it out too much further than our regular hour
that we do. Part three is called the communist position on the Negro question. The
quote from the author is, We have proved that the communists have decided to apply
here in America the same strategy we have proved they are applying everywhere in the
world
all right at the communist sixth world congress in 1928 after spending more than a
decade on the subject like they they had already planned this more than 10 years i
think it was like around 1913 they were starting to think about how can we make
this happen so they’ve spent more than a decade deciding on this, the communists
developed a theory of self -determination specifically for the quote -unquote American
Negroes. And at earlier Congresses, they had stressed the importance of black
Americans in furthering the communist liberation of Africa, but they hadn’t yet been
targeted as a quote -unquote nation in their own right. This new theory was confusing
to American communists and no one was sure what it meant in practice. The notion
that American Negroes might need and want quote unquote self -determination or
secession just because they happen to be black was so ludicrous that even American
comrades themselves found it difficult to accept. The head of the American Communist
Party pointed out that this wasn’t anything American blacks would have thought of
themselves since the whole concept of self -determination was a recent theory created
by the quote -unquote the science of Leninism. And nearly all non -communist Negro
leaders rejected the communist theory, one black communist wrote, but they decided to
apply it anyway, since the economic situation of American blacks and Russian serfs
was so similar, and it had worked there. Author Wilson Record, recorded in his book,
called The Negro and the Communist Party, quote, not only were the general ideas
taken over, they were advocated in precisely the same terms, down to the slogans and
even to the sentences and phrases employed by the Communist International, close
quote.
Black communists were told to emphasize in their propaganda the establishment of a
Negro Soviet Republic. The central slogan was to be, quote, abolition of the whole
system of race discrimination, full racial, social, and political equality for the
Negro people. This was to be used to foment the drive for black nationalism the
necessary step towards full -blown communism. And while they pushed the slogans of
self -determination to blacks in the southern states, the Soviets directed a different
slogan of, quote -unquote, equal rights to be used in the north. In the South,
the communists wanted all of the land taken away from the white farmers and given
to the blacks, quote, to ensure economic and social equality. They also proposed that
the state boundaries be removed and a new territory called, no joke, the black belt,
be created with their own government. You know, there’s the Bible Belt. The
communists were proposing the black belt. This concept of ensuring social equality by
taking from the haves and giving to the have -nots is a common communist or
socialist theme it’s alive and well in america today via many government programs
including health care stimulus checks welfare foreign aid and many others but at the
time this approach was rejected by blacks themselves it was determined by the head
of the american communist party that this didn’t mean it was wrong it was just that
they were too young of a nation to demand self -determination. They started referring
to it as a national people’s liberation. In fact, when the slogan of self
-determination was re -approved at one point, the effect on non -communist Negroes was
so instantaneous and so explosive that the slogan was thereafter withdrawn.
From that time on, the Negro masses would have to be content with phrases such as
free determination of their own destiny. So just got to tweak it a little bit,
change the language. They weren’t seeing themselves as a nation within a nation yet.
So they had to change the way they referred to things a little bit. Stang points
out that the two different goals that the communists had for American blacks, equal
rights and self -determination seem to be at odds with each other when you think
about them. Equal rights would seem to refer to integration, whatever that is. But
self -determination would seem to refer to segregation, whatever that is. An American
Communist Party head at the time the book was written, William Z. Foster clarified
this by saying that blacks would never actually be, quote, unquote, equal until they
had their own nation, which could be merged into world communism, basically making
them one and the same goal. It’s interesting that the slogan of self -determination
was eventually abandoned in relation to American blacks, but as mentioned previously,
it has been used with other racial groups in the United States, like I said, with
the Native Americans.
In light of the information in this chapter, it’s important to ponder why blacks are
still writing in the streets in our own day, even after the quote -unquote success
of the quote -unquote civil rights movement. The answer is that, as this has all
been orchestrated by global communists, they’re not meant to be happy or content,
ever. Communists are still agitating amongst the black community.
of the American Negroes into a full -fledged nation is a basic requirement. It means,
as a result of this struggle, the unfolding of the most fundamental and the most
profound struggles for democracy and the United States. Close quote.
Part four, the black Muslims.
So from the book, so here’s a white man teaching Negroes to hate white people which
to say the least is very peculiar so this chapter actually starts out with the
story of a white peddler quote unquote who went door to door in the black community
of Detroit selling silks that he claimed were like those worn in Africa and the
people asked him to teach them about Africa so he began holding meetings eventually
however he started preaching against whites and the Bible which shocked his listeners,
but, however, some of them became converts to a group called the black Muslims. This
man later told the Detroit police that he was, quote, the supreme ruler of the
universe, and that his teachings, quote, were strictly a racket to get all the money
he could out of it. He turned his new religion over to a man named Elijah Muhammad
and returned to his native New Zealand. Here’s a picture of this Elijah Muhammad.
He listed the beliefs and goals of his group, Muhammad did, including, quote,
complete separation in a state or territory of our own, close quote. They wanted
several states as back payment for slave labor, and he claimed that white rule in
the United States would be overthrown by 1970. The majority of black Muslim converts
came from the poor and less educated areas, which is exactly where the communists
have always claimed the necessity of focusing, the so -called working class, right?
That’s the whole point of the hammer and the sickle in their insignias, right? The
hope among communists, according to their own writings, was that such a united front
of black men would be the catalyst around which blacks would unite so they could be
used to push for secession to form their own nation.
A man by the name of C. Eric Lincoln, author of The Black Muslims in America,
stated, it is doubtful whether any, except the top leadership, know exactly what the
movement’s political aspirations are, or why. But to be fair, the author next
supplies quotations from Muhammad Speaks, a black Muslim newspaper, in order to
support the assertion that they are in fact communists. They praise Cuba and its
revolution, show a photo of the previously mentioned communist Ben Bella of Algeria
giving an award to W .E .B. Du Bois, also a known communist, in Ghana,
which was a communist state. The caption referred to Ben Bella as, quote, the young
revolutionary who led Algeria’s
successful seven -year struggle for freedom, close quote. And they refer to Dubois as,
quote, a champion in the cause for liberty for all Africa, close quote.
Another issue praises the, quote, young and charming Julius Nierre, president of the
communist Tanzania, and refers to the communist Jomo Kenyatta, referred to earlier,
who conducted the murder and dismemberment of both black and white Africans as,
quote, an African freedom fighter. It praised the president of communist Ghana.
Similar nonsense is provided from other issues of this magazine. The most important
thing to be learned from the whole publication, says Stang, is that whatever goes
wrong, some white man did it. Unless, as demonstrated within its pages, that white
person is a communist. So you’ll note in this chapter the communist origins of the
reparations for blacks, right? We should also note the similarity between the black
Muslims, a communist front religion based on Islam and the People’s Temple, which was
the communist front religion based on Christianity that was run by Jim Jones. And
we’ve all heard about Jim Jones and the supposed mass suicide in Guyana, which is
the origin of the phrase, drink the Kool -Aid, right? And we’ve all been taught that
they were a Christian cult. You’ll see that everywhere. I think that’s even what it
says in Wikipedia. But the truth is that they were a communist organization. There
are recordings of conversations between the quote -unquote reverend Jim Jones and his
quote -unquote parishioners talking about people they’d like to kill.
And at least one of them was on drugs during the recording that I listened to
where they discussed that. Jones was white.
He mentions a group of people wanting to burn his house down and says that one of
them had been an advisor to Chang Kai Sheck, the anti -communist former leader of
China, and that they had been instigated by the John Birch Society. He admits to
being a member of the World Peace Council, which, quote, emerged from the policy of
the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to promote peace campaigns around the world
in order to oppose, quote, unquote, warmongering by the United States, close quote.
Part 5 of the book is referred to as the Blood Brothers. Quote from the author
says, if the country you were after was in the United States, the first thing you’d
do is kill some white men. That would probably provoke some white men to retaliate
against Negroes, which would probably provoke some Negroes to retaliate.
Now, the author begins this chapter by relating the tale of several stabbings that
took place in Harlem, quote -unquote, right -wing extremism was blamed along with a
quote -unquote atmosphere of hate. Are these things sounding familiar? They should
because that’s what’s in the news right now. The criminals were eventually caught and
they turned out to be members of a black gang calling themselves the blood brothers.
They were trained in karate and judo and believed in killing and murdering. An
offshoot of that group called the black Molly Zules believed in violence and killing
white people specifically. Stang describes how the plan for quote unquote national
liberation under the communists always begins with the killing of the quote unquote
colonialists or the members of the quote unquote oppressing nation that the nation to
be liberated finds themselves in. The next step is to start killing members of the
nation that’s to be liberated and forced them to join your movement.
He points out that these steps were reliably followed in the Congo, Quebec, Algeria,
and New York. It was followed by the Viet Cong and Vietnam.
In Algeria, the communists claimed their revolt was over the Koran and against
infidels. They slit the throats of any Muslims who disagreed. There’s an important
point for us to note here, seeing that Islam’s once again being raised out.
Throughout this chapter, Stang interlaces news reports and quotations from other
communist national liberation movements, showing that the same things were happening.
In America, the black Muslims denied any knowledge of or association with the Blood
Brothers. However, a detective in one of the New York murders said that it was the
knowledge of the youth’s link with the black Muslims that had led to their speedy
arrests.
We next learn about a group called the Fruit of Islam, the security arm of the
black Muslim organization. They’re the ones teaching the youth, or were at the time
teaching the youth to fight, and they were used to enforce obedience among black
Muslim members. Their training manual states that, quote, all traitors who betray
their brothers or sisters be murdered without mercy.
From Malcolm X, we learned that the black Muslims have ministers working inside every
prison in the country. This is where they get many of their members, including
Malcolm himself, while he was in prison for armed robbery. In Algeria, Ben Bella was
likewise in prison for armed robbery when the communist came to power, released him,
and put him in a leadership position. And then at this point in the book, Alan
Stang points out the nation of Islam, associated with the black Muslims proclaim it
their duty to, quote, murder the devil, meaning white people. Under Jomo Kenyatta,
the Mao, in Africa, had the same stated purpose, particularly to kill Europeans,
but more generally, quote, to kill, no matter who is to be the victim, even one’s
father or brother, close quote.
The author points out that in a so -called War of National Liberation among the
first things needed are a test and a reward for the new recruits. The nation of
Islam, for instance, required members to kill or seriously maim a white person before
they could use the letter X as their surname. The Algerian communists required new
recruits to, quote, murder at least a colonialist or a known traitor, close quote,
before they could serve in the army. We’re also reminded that discipline is required,
and we read of the loyalty oaths of the Mao -Mao, which mandated death for all
infractions, as well as death for infractions among members of the nation of Islam,
including missing meetings. So you don’t show up, you’re dead. Another necessary step
in the fight for national liberation we learn next is to complain about police
brutality as justification for one’s actions. Algerian documents show that communist
groups, showing that communist group, sorry, stating that if caught, they will never
hesitate to accuse the police of torture and brutalities. The Blood Brothers openly
claimed that the main reason the gang started was to protect ourselves in a group
against police brutality. Close quote. The Congress of Racial Equality spoke,
quote, of an orgy of blood, violence, and sadism, close quote, by the police that
they supposedly witnessed. In New York, police commissioner Michael J.
Murphy reported that during and before the opening of the World’s Fair, prearranged
protests of brutality were heard even before there had been any encounters between
police and demonstrators. It’s interesting to note that even in the 1960s, they were
already blaming everything on quote -unquote right -wing extremism, as they’ve been
doing in recent times, likewise for complaints about police brutality, which we have
seen in recent years with the Trayvon Martin case and many others, as well as calls
by the Marxist group Black Lives Matter for defunding of the police. And while the
police obviously do have their faults, the most publicized stories are often
fabricated or prearranged. For instance, major news outlets covered an incident on the
UC Davis campus where an officer was filmed, Pepper Spring, a crowd of students like
you can see in the image right here on the screen, who were there as part of the
Occupy Wall Street movement. Luckily, another bystander also filmed the incident and
made their video available online, showing that the students had deliberately encircled
a group of campus police officers.
Sorry, give me one second. I lost my mouse.
There we go. They deliberately encircled a group of campus police officers were
accosting them and would not let them leave. The incident had been
and included a very limited angle of the original video used in news reports,
which deliberately removed context in order to make the story inflammatory. And to
top it off, UC Davis paid $30 ,000 to each of the 21 protesters who sued the
college over the incident.
Part 6. Making of the Revolution Stalin said, as Lenin has said,
A terrible clash between Soviet Russia and the capitalist states must inevitably
occur. The ruling classes must be in the throes of a major government crisis,
so that the government is so enfeebled, the revolutionists can speedily overthrow it.
I guarantee you, we are there.
We learned that at some point, Malcolm X splits from the black Muslims, travels to
Mecca, and suddenly learns that all races are equal under Islam. He calls for
younger whites to, quote, turn for spiritual salvation to the religion of Islam and
force the older generation of American whites to turn with them, close quote. And so
that we don’t think this is actually a religious movement suddenly, Malcolm X holds
a press conference where he states that, quote, outside the UN, we have friends, 700
million Chinese who are ready to die for human rights, close quote. He also mentions
having tea with the Chinese ambassador in Africa, who, quote, very politely reminded
that Pau, I’m sorry, very politely reminded that Mautse Tung was the first head of
state to declare the open support of his government and its 800 million people
behind the Afro -American struggle, close quote. Fidel Castro,
while visiting Harlem, held a secret two -hour conference with Malcolm X. A conference
of 75 Negro students in Nashville called for unity with the African, Asian, and
Latin American Revolution. Plans include the elimination of capitalism in this country
and the world and support for revolutionary black internationalism. So you can see
how all, again, all these groups all working together, even when they supposedly…
This group sent letters to the Viet Cong, congratulating them on defeating American
forces. One quote -unquote underground leader declared that they can damage major dams,
disrupt communications, pour gasoline into sewers and light it, and cause chaos,
that he believed that not all whites would fight, but that all blacks would, and
that We call the white’s cream puffs. We feel that when TV stops,
when the telephone no longer rings, their world will almost come to an end.
Like during a major air raid, they will stay in the house. They’ll sit and wait
for the television to come back on.
Another man by the name of Robert F. Williams, a communist associated with the NWACP
was publishing a newsletter in Havana, Cuba, in which he declared that massive
violence was coming to America, wherein they would bring transportation to a
standstill,
sever and blow up pipelines,
and that black GIs in the military would suddenly turn on their fellow soldiers
alongside local revolutionaries. He discusses ways to kill men and other domestic
enemies, including using flamethrowers. He declares that blacks will prove ourselves
willing and ready to meet the violence and terror of oppression with the violence
and terror of liberation, close quote. It’s laughable to think of Malcolm X claiming
that the Chinese communists are concerned with human rights, quote unquote, considering
their torture, imprisonment, and persecution of the Phelan Gong sect, the Uyghur
Muslims, Christians in general, Buddhists, and many other violations. And we’re again
reminded in this chapter of recent events concerning the Black Lives Matter Group.
Many wondered why if their concern was for black people, they would loot and burn
down black businesses. The answer, of course, is that the true motivation has nothing
to do with race. It is a communist movement attempting to stop the machinery of
government, hurt the economy, and unleash violence. We are told in the text by one
of the leaders in a black revolutionary group that, quote, black youth with the
right orientation can stop this entire country, close quote.
And I want to say that just unfortunately, I think the quote about white people
sitting around and waiting for the TV to come back on while revolution is going on
is unfortunately true of a lot of Americans. And I think that’s the reason why we
have the bread and circuses being provided by the U .S. government right now and by
the entertainment industry. They want to keep everybody fat, stupid, and distracted so
that they won’t get in the way while they’re rolling out the black carpet or should
I say red carpet for the revolution to come, which is the title of this next
section. The Communist Party strives only to exploit what are often legitimate Negro
complaints and grievances for the advancement of communist objectives. Racial incidents
are magnified and dramatized by communists in an effort to generate racial tensions.
This chapter begins in Harlem with a police officer shooting a black youth who
repeatedly attacked him with a knife. This was deemed police brutality. About two
days later, there was a march on a police station that turned into a riot, and
only a few hours after that, large sections of New York City were fast approaching
open warfare. The riots lasted for three days. At the boy’s funeral,
paratrooper seized at least 10 youths with knives under their shirts. So on a
similar note, you may have seen this just recently. There was a black man in
Portland, Oregon, who was recently acquitted of stabbing a white man 17 times and
the reason they let him off was because after he stabbed the white guy the white
guy called him the n -word and so somehow that was oh i guess that evens out so
we’ll let you off of stabbing him 17 times sang provides a quotation from the new
york times concerning the communist revolution in saigon vietnam Quote, the second
phase, according to one document, is to get people out into the streets. Quarrels
are to be provoked, youth groups are to be armed with clubs and knives, allegedly
to protect themselves in a manufactured tension, close quote. In Harlem,
a group of about 200 blacks and a few whites arrived from out of town in about 50
cars. They chose neighborhoods to set up what amounted to command posts and joined
the race rioting from there, returning to eat, sleep, etc.
Thousands of Negroes in Harlem are armed, and that sooner or later they will use
their guns against the cops. The Harlem Freedom Fighters distributed flyers teaching
people how to make Maltaf cocktails. A man by the name of Albert Geyard testified
before the House Committee on Un -American Activities that he had heard two other
communists, Benjamin Davis and Jesse Gray,
speak about how the conspiracy badly needed to organize and stimulate a Negro youth
movement
he openly called for a hundred black revolutionaries for guerrilla warfare. The
Communist Party in Germany, we are told, also organized along the lines of hundred
men groups, which can be trained in the use of firearms and street fighting, close
quote. While this has been happening, Malcolm X has been in Cairo. However,
detectives discover, after a five -month -long investigation, that many of these
communists in Harlem have been using a certain store as their headquarters, and that
it is known to also be a place frequented by UN attaches from the United Arab
Republic and various leftist African nations, close quote. At the time,
Egypt was known as the United Arab Republic, and Cairo was the capital. Again,
that’s where Malcolm X was. Cairo is also where the decision was made and the money
spent to launch the communist coup in Algeria. When all of this was revealed,
the so -called Martin Luther King Jr., again, I didn’t mention this earlier, his real
name was Michael, stated publicly that he was sick and tired of people saying this
movement has been infiltrated by communists and communist sympathizers. There are as
many communists in this freedom movement as there are Eskimos in Florida. Keep that
quote in mind.
And then here is quoted a William Epton, a black chairman of both the progressive
labor movement and the Harlem Defense Council, who says about the PLM, we arrived at
what we consider to be a correct Marxist -Leninist position. Our position happens to
be almost the same as that of the Chinese, close quote. A news station reported
that the PLM’s money comes from Red China through Cuba.
affected areas. In Philadelphia, more riots broke out, about which we are told that
seizing on a minor incident, these agitators quickly put into operation a well
-organized plan, which included rapidly spreading lies that the police had killed a
woman, shot a boy, or beaten a pregnant woman in order to incite anger and
violence. Meanwhile, Malcolm X was still in Cairo, negotiating for munitions,
and spending a considerable amount of time in the presence of international communist
propagandists. He publicly endorsed the rioting back home and was featured prominently
on Chinese broadcasts. After the riots, the Unity Council of Harlem Organizations is
formed, and we are provided with a quote from communist official Benjamin Davis about
the necessity of convening, quote, a national convention of the Negro people,
representative of all points of view without exception, in order to, quote, unite the
national Negro community around a common effective method of achieving freedom now.
Alan Stang begins this next chapter by pointing out that while things seem to be
going well for the communists, they know they can’t just go around killing everyone,
as they’ve done in much smaller countries. There are too many Americans who will
fight back. So where can they turn for support? The UN, of course. And I mentioned
this earlier. This was why Malcolm X was in Africa. The communists started appealing
to the United Nations to intercede in American affairs. Why? Because it’s filled with
representatives from socialist and communist nations. Stang points out that the UN
opposed self -determination when the nation of Katanga seceded from Congo. This,
however, was because they were led by an anti -communist, Moisei Kapand de Chombe.
It wasn’t one of their, quote, Wars of National Liberation, unquote. We’re reminded
of the emphasis Lenin and Stalin placed on using this tactic only when it was
expedient to further global communism. In short, if a communist faction secedes from
a non -communist country, that is a war of national liberation. But if a non
-communist province says seeds from a communist country, that’s morally wrong. That’s
fascist exploitation of the laboring masses. A quotation from a communist pamphlet
here discusses how much better off blacks would be if they were allowed to separate
from the United States. And this is shown by the position enjoyed by the formerly
subject nationalities in the Soviet Union. Obviously, you can see how well off all
the people are there, especially back then during the 60s, right? The author here
points out that what this is all leading to, using national liberation to break up
the United States so that it would become, quote, unquote, more manageable.
Okay, that puts us at the end of the first half of the book.
I know that that was kind of crazy, and it was pretty fast -paced. I apologize, but
it took, like I said, about an hour as I foresaw there. We’ll cover the last half
of the book next week. But a lot of enlightening things, a lot of really
interesting stuff. You can see that there were a lot of these organizations that
were working together in the shadows here and there some of them would be discovered
closed down reform under another name somewhere else using the exact same p .O.
box or office location or the same exact people so that they wouldn’t have their
communist affiliations discovered.
All right. Carmen, I can see your mic is unmuted.
Are you able to give us the minutes from last week real quick before we close our
meeting tonight?
She got a new computer and doesn’t have any hardware to go with it. Oh,
gotcha. Okay. That’s what’s going on. All right. Well, we can do something brief
from last time’s minutes next time probably and just get everybody caught up. I
appreciate everybody being here. And I think what we’re going to do since we’re over
time is we’ll go ahead and just have a closing prayer. And then I know that Ben
usually likes to stay on afterwards if people have, so I want to have some
discussion or there’s something that happened during the week that they want to bring
up to the group. So can I, Micah, can I get you to go ahead and for us the
closing prayer tonight? Yeah, sure.
Okay. Jeremy and Father, thank you for this time. We’ve had to come together and
meet and learn. Please bless us with the spirit of learning that we might be able
to retain
the important things that are good for us to remember, especially with how the
conspiracy operates
and its functions. We’re grateful, Lord, for thee, and we ask you please watch over
us and keep us safe. We say these things in the name of Jesus Christ, amen. At
the Tree of Liberty Society, we’re not just studying history. We’re restoring the
principles that built a free people. This movement isn’t funded by corporations or
politicians. It’s built by people, Patriots who care enough to act.
Now you can stand shoulder to shoulder with us through YouTube memberships, a simple
way to strengthen the cause of liberty while gaining access to deeper discussions,
exclusive content, and direct engagement with the society.
As a patriot for just $1 .99 a month, you’ll carry your badge of support with the
loyalty icons, custom emojis, members only live chats, and priority replies to your
comments. At the Minuteman level for just $6 .99 a month, you’ll get early access to
new videos and all the benefits of the Patriot Rink, a digital call to arms for
those ready to act before the crowd. The Sons of Liberty Tier at $999 brings you
even closer, with personal shoutouts, connections on social media, and every perk from
the earlier levels. And for those who wish to help lead the charge, the Founders
Club at just 1999 a month opens the door to members -only live streams,
exclusive videos, and all the rewards of the previous levels direct access to the
conversations shaping the future of liberty. If you believe liberty is worth
defending, not only in word but in action, then join us. not as spectators